Gut 2015; online; doi:10.1136\/gutjnl-2014-308552<\/p>\n
| Barrett\u2019s oesophagus length is established at the time of initial endoscopy and does not change over time: results from a large multicentre cohort<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n |
| Fouad J Moawad, (1) Patrick E Young, Srinivas Gaddam, Prashanth Vennalaganti, Prashanthi N Thota, John Vargo, Brooks D Cash, Gary W Falk, Richard E Sampliner, David Lieberman, Prateek Sharma<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n (1) Gastroenterology Service, Department of Medicine, Walter Reed National Military Medical Center, 8901 Wisconsin Ave., Bethesda<\/p>\n Objective<\/b><\/h3>\nIt is unclear whether Barrett\u2019s oesophagus (BO) length changes over time or whether the full length of the segment is established at the onset of disease recognition. The objectives of this study were to evaluate the association of age and BO length and to evaluate the changes in BO length over time.<\/p>\n Design<\/b><\/h3>\nThis is a prospective, multicentre cohort study involving patients with BO from five centres. Patients were divided into groups based on the decade of initial diagnosis of BO. The mean BO length and the mean change in BO length were calculated for each age decade. The mean change in BO length was also calculated between the index endoscopy and the last surveillance endoscopy.<\/p>\n Results<\/b><\/h3>\n3635 patients with BO were included in the study: 87.8% men, 92.8% Caucasians, mean age 60.9 years and mean BO length 3.5 cm. The mean change in BO length was 0.9 cm. The mean BO length did not significantly change for each age category: 80 years (4.5 cm), p=0.47. On subgroup analysis of patients with non-dysplastic BO who had at least 1 year of endoscopic follow up, there was a significant decrease in mean change in BO length across age categories ranging from +1.7 to \u22120.8 cm, p=0.03.<\/p>\n Conclusions<\/b><\/h3>\nThere was no significant difference in BO length by age category in decades. In addition, the change in BO length from index to follow-up endoscopy was similar among patients >30 years. These findings suggest that a patient\u2019s BO segment length attains its full extent by the time of the initial endoscopic examination.<\/p>\n What you need to knowf<\/span><\/h2>\nA large prospective multicenter cohort study, including 3635 patients with Barrett\u2019s esophagus,<\/strong> has now investigated the extent to which different age cohorts differ with regard to the length of the Barrett\u2019s segment at the initial examination and during the course of monitoring, and whether there is any association with the risk of neoplasia (3)<\/sup>. Registry data were collected prospectively in five centers in the United States and analyzed in relation to this issue. The data collected were: age at first presentation, sex, endoscopic (length in centimeters) and histological Barrett\u2019s characteristics (both initially and during the course), and also additional factors such as concomitant medication, body mass index (BMI), ethnicity, and nicotine abuse. The patients were analyzed separately in the following age cohorts : <\u00a030\u00a0years, 30\u201339\u00a0years, 40\u201349\u00a0years, 50\u201359\u00a0years, 60\u201369\u00a0years, 70\u201379\u00a0years, and >\u00a080\u00a0years.<\/p>\n The results showed that there was no correlation between Barrett\u2019s segment length and increasing age.<\/strong> In addition, no Barrett\u2019s growth was observed during the follow-up screening endoscopies. On the contrary: over all of the age cohorts, a mean decline in the Barrett\u2019s length of approximately 1\u00a0cm was noted, although the decline was not significant in any single age group. The authors therefore suspect that the apparent shrinking of the Barrett\u2019s segment was either produced by the PPI treatment that was being administered in more than 90% of the patients, or was simply explained by measurement variability during endoscopy.<\/p>\n The length of Barrett\u2019s segments thus does not change, and no differences with regard to the length of the Barrett\u2019s segment were identified in any of the age groups. What does this mean for practical physicians?<\/strong> Actually nothing at all, since a lack of increase in the length of the Barrett\u2019s segment with increasing age does not automatically mean that the risk of neoplasia developing has vanished. Endoscopic and biopsy monitoring can therefore not be stopped solely for that reason alone. On the other hand, it shows once again that the risk of malignancy in Barrett\u2019s esophagus is on the one hand very low, while on the other it is also very difficult to assess. Generally, the data do essentially confirm what every endoscopist already at least suspected beforehand: there are \u201cshort and long\u201d Barrett\u2019s segments as well as \u201cgood and bad\u201d Barrett\u2019s segments, but with a quite stable course during monitoring. And if a Barrett\u2019s segment is going to become neoplastic, this occurs during the first year of monitoring in the majority of cases. This observation in turn implies that the neoplasia in the Barrett\u2019s segment was already present at the initial endoscopy (although perhaps not yet so easy to locate). Accordingly, the modified recommendations also state that the first check-up endoscopy should be scheduled during the first year, while subsequent check-ups can follow after 3\u20134\u00a0years (4)<\/sup>.<\/p>\n However, the data published by Moawad et al. are also of interest in that it is still absolutely unclear how in fact Barrett\u2019s esophagus arises so suddenly (no matter what form it takes).<\/strong> Sometime or other, an event of some type must take place, or are we already born with a Barrett\u2019s segment with a predetermined length and risk of malignancy? Data on Barrett\u2019s in children and young adults are extremely rare, however. In this context, it may be regarded as a weak point in the registry used in this study that the age cohort of 50\u201370-year-olds represented more than half of the overall population, while the 30\u201350-year-olds were only 18% and those under 30 only represented less than 1%. Despite the relatively large number of Barrett\u2019s patients, therefore, a certain amount of population-related bias cannot be excluded. Ultimately, therefore, what is needed is further data on the prevalence, extent, and histology of Barrett\u2019s esophagus. It would also be important to find out whether individual genetic markers, for example, could be identified during the course of the disease or perhaps even initially, in order to allow better assessment of the risk for malignant progression and make monitoring more effective. Overall, therefore, there is thus plenty of room for further research to explain the pathogenesis of Barrett\u2019s metaplasia and Barrett\u2019s neoplasia.<\/p>\n The risk of progression of nonneoplastic Barrett\u2019s esophagus to high-grade intraepithelial neoplasia or adenocarcinoma is extremely low and has been reported in recent studies to be 0.12\u20130.33 per year. <\/p>\n","protected":false},"featured_media":1069,"template":"","categories":[97,93],"tags":[864,300,417,865,323,324,866],"ec-magazin-ausgaben":[118],"sponsoren-erwaehnung":[],"autor":[],"class_list":["post-1120","literatur","type-literatur","status-publish","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-literature","category-upper-gi-tract","tag-barrett-en","tag-barrett","tag-control-interval","tag-follow-up-en","tag-follow-up","tag-surveillance","tag-surveillance-en","ec-magazin-ausgaben-ec-magazine-2015-02"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.endoscopy-campus.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/literatur\/1120","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.endoscopy-campus.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/literatur"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.endoscopy-campus.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/literatur"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.endoscopy-campus.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/1069"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.endoscopy-campus.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=1120"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.endoscopy-campus.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=1120"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.endoscopy-campus.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=1120"},{"taxonomy":"ec-magazin-ausgaben","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.endoscopy-campus.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/ec-magazin-ausgaben?post=1120"},{"taxonomy":"sponsoren-erwaehnung","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.endoscopy-campus.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/sponsoren-erwaehnung?post=1120"},{"taxonomy":"autor","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.endoscopy-campus.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/autor?post=1120"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}} |