{"id":14296,"date":"2023-06-22T16:54:00","date_gmt":"2023-06-22T14:54:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.endoscopy-campus.com\/?post_type=ec-news&#038;p=14296"},"modified":"2023-06-22T16:54:01","modified_gmt":"2023-06-22T14:54:01","slug":"more-on-expanding-adr-measurement-beyond-screening","status":"publish","type":"ec-news","link":"https:\/\/www.endoscopy-campus.com\/en\/ec-news\/more-on-expanding-adr-measurement-beyond-screening\/","title":{"rendered":"More on Expanding ADR Measurement Beyond Screening"},"content":{"rendered":"\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Current recommendations suggest measuring the adenoma detection rate (ADR) in first-time screening colonoscopies. Several studies have found that including surveillance and diagnostic colonoscopies in an \u201coverall\u201d calculation results in values for ADR that are similar to screening ADR and classification of most physicians as high or low detectors similar to screening ADR.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">This study examined the impact of including other indications for colonoscopy in the ADR calculation among 487 endoscopists who performed 1.05 million colonoscopies negative for colorectal cancer between 2011 and 2019. The mean overall ADR was 36.3%, screening ADR was 29.7%, and surveillance ADR was 48.6%. The mean ADR was 51.6% for colonoscopies with fecal immunochemical test (FIT)-positive indications, and the ADR for diagnostic examinations, excluding FIT-positive indications, was 36%.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Among providers in the lowest quartile for screening ADR, 85% remained in the lowest quartile for overall ADR. For all quartiles of ADR, 70% had identical quartile rankings for overall ADR versus screening ADR.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Current recommendations suggest measuring the adenoma detection rate (ADR) in first-time screening colonoscopies. Several studies have found that including surveillance and diagnostic colonoscopies in an \u201coverall\u201d calculation results in values for ADR that are similar to screening ADR and classification of most physicians as high or low detectors similar to screening ADR. This study examined &#8230; <a title=\"More on Expanding ADR Measurement Beyond Screening\" class=\"read-more\" href=\"https:\/\/www.endoscopy-campus.com\/en\/ec-news\/more-on-expanding-adr-measurement-beyond-screening\/\" aria-label=\"Read more about More on Expanding ADR Measurement Beyond Screening\">Read more<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"template":"","categories":[1768,1769],"tags":[2470,1933,2058,3760],"class_list":["post-14296","ec-news","type-ec-news","status-publish","hentry","category-asge-journal-scan","category-asge-kolon","tag-adenoma-detection-rate-2","tag-adr-2","tag-colon-2","tag-fit-positive"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.endoscopy-campus.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/ec-news\/14296","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.endoscopy-campus.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/ec-news"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.endoscopy-campus.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/ec-news"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.endoscopy-campus.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=14296"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.endoscopy-campus.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=14296"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.endoscopy-campus.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=14296"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}