{"id":14024,"date":"2023-04-20T14:25:41","date_gmt":"2023-04-20T12:25:41","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.endoscopy-campus.com\/?post_type=ec-news&#038;p=14024"},"modified":"2023-04-20T14:25:42","modified_gmt":"2023-04-20T12:25:42","slug":"combined-emr-and-full-thickness-resection-for-large-nonlifting-colorectal-adenomas","status":"publish","type":"ec-news","link":"https:\/\/www.endoscopy-campus.com\/en\/ec-news\/combined-emr-and-full-thickness-resection-for-large-nonlifting-colorectal-adenomas\/","title":{"rendered":"Combined EMR and Full-Thickness Resection for Large Nonlifting Colorectal Adenomas"},"content":{"rendered":"\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) is an option for scarred, large colorectal adenomas that do not lift well and\/or contain a suspicious area of an advanced lesion. Endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) followed by endoscopic full-thickness resection (EFTR), however, is faster and easier than ESD for these types of lesions. The current description of this hybrid-EFTR approach includes 75 patients and is the largest series yet reported.&nbsp;<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">The mean lesion size was 36.5 mm, and two-thirds were right-sided. Six lesions involved the appendiceal orifice. Most of the lesions had been previously treated in some fashion. Technical success was 100%, although, in two cases, the entire lesion could not be pulled into the cap of the full-thickness resection device.&nbsp;<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">The mean procedure time was 83.6 minutes, with T1 cancer identified in 12 cases, and 8 of these had subsequent surgery for adverse histologic features. Among the adverse features included in the study was deep submucosal invasion, and one patient required surgery for appendicitis.&nbsp;<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">There were 70 patients with follow-up, with an 11.4% rate of residual lesion, of which all but one were treated by repeat EFTR.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) is an option for scarred, large colorectal adenomas that do not lift well and\/or contain a suspicious area of an advanced lesion. Endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) followed by endoscopic full-thickness resection (EFTR), however, is faster and easier than ESD for these types of lesions. The current description of this hybrid-EFTR approach &#8230; <a title=\"Combined EMR and Full-Thickness Resection for Large Nonlifting Colorectal Adenomas\" class=\"read-more\" href=\"https:\/\/www.endoscopy-campus.com\/en\/ec-news\/combined-emr-and-full-thickness-resection-for-large-nonlifting-colorectal-adenomas\/\" aria-label=\"Read more about Combined EMR and Full-Thickness Resection for Large Nonlifting Colorectal Adenomas\">Read more<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"template":"","categories":[1768,1769],"tags":[2058,730,268,2983,785,267,2143],"class_list":["post-14024","ec-news","type-ec-news","status-publish","hentry","category-asge-journal-scan","category-asge-kolon","tag-colon-2","tag-eftr","tag-emr","tag-endoscopic-full-thickness-resection","tag-endoscopic-submucosal-dissection","tag-esd","tag-t1"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.endoscopy-campus.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/ec-news\/14024","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.endoscopy-campus.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/ec-news"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.endoscopy-campus.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/ec-news"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.endoscopy-campus.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=14024"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.endoscopy-campus.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=14024"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.endoscopy-campus.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=14024"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}