{"id":11198,"date":"2021-11-01T13:32:34","date_gmt":"2021-11-01T12:32:34","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.endoscopy-campus.com\/?post_type=ec-news&#038;p=11198"},"modified":"2021-11-01T13:32:36","modified_gmt":"2021-11-01T12:32:36","slug":"meta-analysis-of-full-thickness-resection-in-the-colorectum","status":"publish","type":"ec-news","link":"https:\/\/www.endoscopy-campus.com\/en\/ec-news\/meta-analysis-of-full-thickness-resection-in-the-colorectum\/","title":{"rendered":"Meta-Analysis of Full-Thickness Resection in the Colorectum"},"content":{"rendered":"\n<p>In a meta-analysis of 14 studies of colorectal endoscopic full-thickness resection (EFTR) involving 1936 patients, 76% of lesions were in the colon and the remainder in the rectum. Mean procedure time was 45 minutes, and pooled technical success was 87.6%, with R0 resection of 78.8%. The recurrence rate was 12.6%, and adverse events occurred in 12.2%. Adverse events included perforation (4.4%), postpolypectomy syndrome (1.7%), appendicitis after resection of appendiceal lesions (11.5%), and need for surgery after EFTR (5.5%).<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Subgroup analysis showed that the R0 resection rate was lower (odds ratio [OR], 0.3) and the adverse event rate higher (OR, 3.5) for lesions &gt;20 mm.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>In a meta-analysis of 14 studies of colorectal endoscopic full-thickness resection (EFTR) involving 1936 patients, 76% of lesions were in the colon and the remainder in the rectum. Mean procedure time was 45 minutes, and pooled technical success was 87.6%, with R0 resection of 78.8%. The recurrence rate was 12.6%, and adverse events occurred in &#8230; <a title=\"Meta-Analysis of Full-Thickness Resection in the Colorectum\" class=\"read-more\" href=\"https:\/\/www.endoscopy-campus.com\/en\/ec-news\/meta-analysis-of-full-thickness-resection-in-the-colorectum\/\" aria-label=\"Read more about Meta-Analysis of Full-Thickness Resection in the Colorectum\">Read more<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"template":"","categories":[1768,1769],"tags":[2058,730,2983,267,3041],"class_list":["post-11198","ec-news","type-ec-news","status-publish","hentry","category-asge-journal-scan","category-asge-kolon","tag-colon-2","tag-eftr","tag-endoscopic-full-thickness-resection","tag-esd","tag-underwater-emr"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.endoscopy-campus.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/ec-news\/11198","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.endoscopy-campus.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/ec-news"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.endoscopy-campus.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/ec-news"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.endoscopy-campus.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=11198"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.endoscopy-campus.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=11198"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.endoscopy-campus.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=11198"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}