{"id":11011,"date":"2021-09-28T11:34:22","date_gmt":"2021-09-28T09:34:22","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.endoscopy-campus.com\/?post_type=ec-news&#038;p=11011"},"modified":"2021-09-28T11:34:23","modified_gmt":"2021-09-28T09:34:23","slug":"peg-placement-is-the-radiologic-surgical-or-endoscopic-technique-safest","status":"publish","type":"ec-news","link":"https:\/\/www.endoscopy-campus.com\/en\/ec-news\/peg-placement-is-the-radiologic-surgical-or-endoscopic-technique-safest\/","title":{"rendered":"PEG Placement: Is the Radiologic, Surgical, or Endoscopic Technique Safest?"},"content":{"rendered":"\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">The optimal technique for gastrostomy tube placement remains undefined. This retrospective study used the Nationwide Readmissions Database and the International Classification of Diseases Procedure Coding System to identify and analyze the outcomes and adverse events of inpatients who underwent creation of a gastrostomy by one of 3 techniques: percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG), fluoroscopy-guided gastrostomy by an interventional radiologist (IR-gastrostomy), or open gastrostomy performed by surgery (surgical gastrostomy).&nbsp;<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">A total of 184,068 patients who underwent inpatient gastrostomy tube placement in 2016 and 2017 were identified: 16,384 underwent PEG, 154,007 received IR-gastrostomy, and 13,677 had surgical gastrostomy. The adjusted odds ratios for adverse events associated with each technique were calculated using multivariable logistic regression analysis.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Compared with PEG, the odds of colon perforation were 1.90 (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.26-2.86; <em>P<\/em>=.002) with IR gastrostomy and 6.65 (95% CI, 4.38-10.12; <em>P<\/em>&lt;.001) with surgical gastrostomy; the odds of infection of the gastrostomy were 1.28 (95% CI, 1.07-1.53; <em>P<\/em>=.006) for IR-gastrostomy and 1.61 (95% CI, 1.29-2.01; <em>P<\/em>&lt;.001) for surgical gastrostomy; and the odds of bleeding requiring a blood transfusion were 1.84 (95% CI, 1.26-2.68; <em>P<\/em>=.002) for IR-gastrostomy and 1.09 (95% CI, .64-1.86; <em>P<\/em>=.746) for surgical gastrostomy. Also compared with PEG, the odds for nonelective 30-day readmission were 1.07 (95% CI, 1.03-1.12; <em>P<\/em>=.0023) for IR-gastrostomy and 1.13 (95% CI, 1.06-1.2; <em>P<\/em>=.0002) for surgical gastrostomy, and the odds of inpatient mortality were 1.09 (95% CI, 1.02-1.17; <em>P<\/em>=.0114) with IR-gastrostomy and 1.55 (95% CI, 1.42-1.69; <em>P<\/em>&lt;.0001) with surgical gastrostomy.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>The optimal technique for gastrostomy tube placement remains undefined. This retrospective study used the Nationwide Readmissions Database and the International Classification of Diseases Procedure Coding System to identify and analyze the outcomes and adverse events of inpatients who underwent creation of a gastrostomy by one of 3 techniques: percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG), fluoroscopy-guided gastrostomy by &#8230; <a title=\"PEG Placement: Is the Radiologic, Surgical, or Endoscopic Technique Safest?\" class=\"read-more\" href=\"https:\/\/www.endoscopy-campus.com\/en\/ec-news\/peg-placement-is-the-radiologic-surgical-or-endoscopic-technique-safest\/\" aria-label=\"Read more about PEG Placement: Is the Radiologic, Surgical, or Endoscopic Technique Safest?\">Read more<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"template":"","categories":[1768,1789],"tags":[2159,306,2103,2962],"class_list":["post-11011","ec-news","type-ec-news","status-publish","hentry","category-asge-journal-scan","category-stomach-and-small-bowel","tag-ir-gastrostomy-2","tag-peg","tag-stomach-2","tag-surgical-gastrostomy"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.endoscopy-campus.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/ec-news\/11011","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.endoscopy-campus.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/ec-news"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.endoscopy-campus.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/ec-news"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.endoscopy-campus.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=11011"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.endoscopy-campus.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=11011"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.endoscopy-campus.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=11011"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}